On this page13 sections
For a startup moving its marketing site from Framer to Next.js, start with Designpixil: the site is redesigned where it needs it and rebuilt in Next.js by one senior designer who builds in both tools, from $3,000 as a fixed project or inside the $4,917 monthly subscription. Roboto Studio publishes Framer and Webflow migration pages that end in Next.js and Sanity, with projects from $25k, FocusReactive runs dedicated Framer and Webflow migrations into a headless CMS and a Next.js front end, Tinloof moved Ramp's 300,000-page site from Webflow to Next.js with zero downtime, Goodspeed Studio publishes migrations from $10,000 and works mostly in Framer, Raze is a two-person US studio with a Webflow to Next.js service, and Webstacks replatforms B2B sites onto Next.js with an ongoing web team.
Designpixil is on this list and we wrote it. Every other agency is judged on the same published facts, and how we ranked is at the end.
The shortlist at a glance
| Agency | Best for | Published price | Minimum project | Not a fit for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Designpixil | A Framer site redesigned and rebuilt in Next.js from $3,000, by one designer who works in both | $4,917/mo subscription, projects from $3,000 | $3,000 | Enterprise programs that need a large team, or products that need backend and infrastructure engineering |
| 2. Roboto Studio | Engineering-led Framer or Webflow migrations into Next.js and Sanity, from $25k | Projects from $25,000 | $25,000+ | Budgets under $25,000, or design-led work; its pages lead with engineering |
| 3. FocusReactive | Scale-ups that want a headless CMS behind the new Next.js site | Not published | Not published | Founders who want a published price, or a small site rebuilt without a CMS change |
| 4. Tinloof | A very large Webflow site that has to move with zero downtime | Not published | Not published | Framer migrations (none published) and founders who want a published price |
| 5. Goodspeed Studio | Founders who want every price published and may stay on Framer | Migrations from $10,000; sites from $10,000; landing pages from $2,500 | $2,500 | Teams that want a Next.js-first studio; its migration product pages lead to Framer or Astro |
| 6. Raze | A two-person senior team with a dedicated Webflow to Next.js service | Not published | Not published | Large multi-locale sites, Framer migrations, or buyers who want a published price |
| 7. Webstacks | Funded B2B teams that want a web team to run the site after the move | Not published | Not published | Founders who want a published price before a call, or product UI design |
What matters for a Framer to Next.js migration
- 01
Where the content goes
Framer stores your pages and CMS collections for you. In Next.js that content has to live somewhere: a headless CMS such as Sanity or Contentful, or MDX files in the repository. Decide this first, because it sets most of the cost and who can edit later.
- 02
URLs, redirects and metadata
A migration loses rankings when slugs change quietly, redirects are skipped or titles and structured data are rebuilt from memory. Ask for a page-by-page URL map, a redirect list and a check of every title and meta description before cutover.
- 03
Port or redesign
A straight port gives you the same site in code, slower to edit and no better looking. The move is the cheapest moment to fix what the Framer site got wrong, so check whether the studio designs as well as builds, or only rebuilds what it is given.
- 04
Editing after launch
Framer let your marketers change a headline in a minute. In Next.js that needs a CMS with preview, or a developer on call. Agree how copy changes will ship after the move, or the new site will fall behind the old one.
What goes wrong when a Framer site moves to code
The usual failure is a pixel-perfect port. The team pays to rebuild exactly what Framer had, loses the editing speed Framer gave them, and gets nothing new in return except a repository. Three months later the pricing page is still the one from before the raise, because changing it now needs a developer.
The second failure is quieter: a few slugs change, the redirects never ship, and the pages that ranked disappear from search for weeks. Treat the move as a redesign with a URL map, keep what ranks, and only move when Next.js earns it. Our Next.js website design page explains when it does; if Framer is still the right tool, our Framer design agency page covers that path.
1. Designpixil: A Framer site redesigned and rebuilt in Next.js from $3,000, by one designer who works in both
We work in both Framer and Next.js, so the first conversation is whether to move at all. When Next.js is the right call, we redesign the pages that need it and rebuild the site in Next.js with AI coding tools such as Claude Code and Codex, every line reviewed by hand. Projects start at $3,000; the subscription is $4,917 a month.
designpixil.com is a Next.js site we designed and built ourselves, and the Whizo AI site shows the marketing work we do for AI startups. One senior designer handles design and build, so the site and your product can share a visual system, and the same person can design the product next.
“We worked with Anant on the Whizo AI website and the experience was great. He quickly understood our product, asked the right questions, and delivered a polished website that communicates our value clearly. If you're building a SaaS or AI product, he's someone who understands how to design for it.”
| Based in | Remote-first, serving the US, UK and EU |
|---|---|
| Founded | 2023 |
| Team | Founder-led: Anant Jain designs every project |
| How you hire them | Monthly design subscription, Fixed-scope projects |
| Published price | $4,917/mo subscription, projects from $3,000 |
| Minimum project | $3,000 |
| Design or build | Designs and builds marketing sites in Next.js or Framer; designs the product and delivers it as a clickable coded prototype or front-end UI code your engineers take over (no backend) |
| AI work they publish | Echo AI case study: whole product in 5 to 6 weeksWhizo AI case study: marketing websiteHAL51 AI: landing page |
| Best for | A Framer site redesigned and rebuilt in Next.js from $3,000, by one designer who works in both |
| Not a fit for | Enterprise programs that need a large team, or products that need backend and infrastructure engineering |
2. Roboto Studio: Engineering-led Framer or Webflow migrations into Next.js and Sanity, from $25k
Roboto Studio publishes a migration page for every source and CMS pair, including Framer to Sanity and Webflow to Sanity, and rebuilds the front end in Next.js. Its FAQ says it has moved Framer sites for several clients and that most migrations take 4 to 6 weeks; projects start at $25k, and its Tray.ai case covers hundreds of thousands of pages.
| Based in | San Francisco, US, with an office in Oxfordshire, UK |
|---|---|
| Founded | Not published |
| Team | Not published |
| How you hire them | Embedded team, Fixed-scope first version, Ongoing build, Codebase audits and upgrades |
| Published price | Projects from $25,000 |
| Minimum project | $25,000+ |
| Design or build | Designs and develops in-house |
| AI work they publish | Tray.ai |
| Best for | Engineering-led Framer or Webflow migrations into Next.js and Sanity, from $25k |
| Not a fit for | Budgets under $25,000, or design-led work; its pages lead with engineering |
3. FocusReactive: Scale-ups that want a headless CMS behind the new Next.js site
FocusReactive publishes Framer migration pages for Contentful, Sanity, Storyblok and Payload that each end in a Next.js front end with SEO preserved, and a Webflow migration page whose third step is a front-end rebuild on Next.js. It has offices in Amsterdam, London and Warsaw, is a Vercel Silver Solution Partner and quotes after a call.
| Based in | Amsterdam, Netherlands, with offices in London, UK and Warsaw, Poland |
|---|---|
| Founded | 2019 |
| Team | 20 engineers in the core team |
| How you hire them | Fixed-scope projects, Dedicated Next.js support packages, Ongoing maintenance |
| Published price | Not published, quoted after a call |
| Minimum project | Not published |
| Design or build | Designs and develops in-house |
| AI work they publish | None published that we found |
| Best for | Scale-ups that want a headless CMS behind the new Next.js site |
| Not a fit for | Founders who want a published price, or a small site rebuilt without a CMS change |
4. Tinloof: A very large Webflow site that has to move with zero downtime
Tinloof migrated ramp.com, a marketing site with more than 300,000 pages, from Webflow to a Next.js front end on Sanity without downtime. It is a fully remote team of 25 or more people registered in Berlin, working since 2020. It publishes no Framer migration and no prices.
| Based in | Berlin, Germany (fully remote team) |
|---|---|
| Founded | 2020 |
| Team | 25+ people |
| How you hire them | Project enquiry |
| Published price | Not published, quoted after a call |
| Minimum project | Not published |
| Design or build | Designs and develops in-house |
| AI work they publish | ARC Prize: ARC Arcade |
| Best for | A very large Webflow site that has to move with zero downtime |
| Not a fit for | Framer migrations (none published) and founders who want a published price |
5. Goodspeed Studio: Founders who want every price published and may stay on Framer
Goodspeed Studio in London lists every price on one page, with migrations from $10,000, sites from $10,000 and landing pages from $2,500. It builds mainly in Framer; a guide on its blog says it moves Framer sites onto Next.js and Sanity, while its migration product pages lead to Framer or Astro, so confirm the Next.js route before signing.
| Based in | London, UK |
|---|---|
| Founded | 2022 |
| Team | Not published |
| How you hire them | Signature Site (fixed price), Landing Page, Tune-Up audit, Migration, Embedded Team (monthly) |
| Published price | Migrations from $10,000; sites from $10,000; landing pages from $2,500 |
| Minimum project | $2,500 |
| Design or build | Designs and develops in-house |
| AI work they publish | RekaSizzleKick: AI sales coach |
| Best for | Founders who want every price published and may stay on Framer |
| Not a fit for | Teams that want a Next.js-first studio; its migration product pages lead to Framer or Astro |
6. Raze: A two-person senior team with a dedicated Webflow to Next.js service
Raze, founded in 2024 and headquartered in the United States, publishes a Webflow to Next.js migration service that fixes scope and timeline once routes, content, functionality and the destination CMS are defined. Its work includes brand and website for Docket, an AI sales assistant. No Framer route and no published price.
| Based in | United States (city not stated), working remotely |
|---|---|
| Founded | 2024 |
| Team | Two co-founders |
| How you hire them | Brand Sprint, Website Sprint, Brand + Website Sprint, Embedded Partner (monthly), Webflow to Next.js migration |
| Published price | Not published, quoted after a call |
| Minimum project | Not published |
| Design or build | Designs and develops in-house |
| AI work they publish | Docket: AI sales assistant |
| Best for | A two-person senior team with a dedicated Webflow to Next.js service |
| Not a fit for | Large multi-locale sites, Framer migrations, or buyers who want a published price |
7. Webstacks: Funded B2B teams that want a web team to run the site after the move
Webstacks sells website migrations and Next.js development as a Vercel Platinum Solution Partner, and says it handles the transition from another platform while keeping SEO intact. Its Fireworks AI case is a replatform and redesign. Its pages name no source platform and no price.
| Based in | San Diego, US (remote-first) |
|---|---|
| Founded | 2020 |
| Team | Not published |
| How you hire them | Website redesigns, Website migrations, Ongoing website product team |
| Published price | Not published, quoted after a call |
| Minimum project | Not published |
| Design or build | Designs and develops in-house |
| AI work they publish | Fireworks AIOctoAI |
| Best for | Funded B2B teams that want a web team to run the site after the move |
| Not a fit for | Founders who want a published price before a call, or product UI design |
How to choose between them
- You want the site redesigned and rebuilt in Next.js by one designer, from $3,000Designpixil
- You have hundreds of thousands of pages and need a content model, with a $25k+ budgetRoboto Studio
- You want a headless CMS behind the new site and have a scale-up budgetFocusReactive
- You might stay on Framer and want every price in the openGoodspeed Studio
- You want a dedicated web team running the site after launchWebstacks
How we ranked this list
We started from the studios founders keep running into when they ask AI assistants and search engines who to hire, then kept the ones that do this kind of work and publish proof of it. Every fact in the tables comes from the agency's own website or its public directory listings, checked on October 23, 2026. Prices are only ones an agency publishes itself; where it doesn't, we say so instead of guessing.
The order is our judgment of fit for this specific buyer, not a score. We put Designpixil first only on lists where we genuinely fit the buyer, and our entry lists who we are not right for, the same as everyone else's. If something about your agency is wrong or out of date, email hello@designpixil.com and we will correct it within a week.
